I haven't read the whole thing, but he makes a point about U.S. Chinese studies academics which jives with my earlier post on the character of seminars on China organized by Harvard academic departments. Gries writes:
Academic China watchers also tend to present a rosy picture of China, rarely speaking out on controversial issues such as human rights. Scholars like Andrew Nathan and Perry Link are the exceptions that prove the rule. Because they have spoken out against Chinese human rights violations, Chinese nationalists and government oRcials have subjected them to vicious personal attacks, and they have been denied visas to China.
Gries, Peter Hays (Author). China's New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy.
Ewing, NJ, USA: University of California Press, 2004. p 2.
Copyright ©2004. University of California Press. All rights reserved.
I am hoping the book talks about the Chinese press, as well. When I get home, I will start writing a precis on Gries' book.
No comments:
Post a Comment